Mediation fails because neither party had true authority - a must for any mediation

The NBA lockout and negotiations to end the lockout failed this week because neither the owner's representative nor the player's representative had authority to negotiate and agree on the one remaining crucial term.  As this reporter related, "There is no rational way to explain this behavior [failure to close the deal], so there has to be something wrong. And the only answer is that neither Stern nor Hunter had the authority to negotiate beyond his established position." Mediation only works if the true principals with authority to make a deal are present in person. Telephone standby, or a pre-determined budget given to an attorney or a fill-in insurance company claims representative is not the same as a principal with authority. Physical presence at a negotiation is necessary for several reasons: the principals show respect by both physically participating; neither side feels slighted or disregarded; the negotiation can proceed efficiently without representatives calling for more authority or to relay along critical new information learned at the session; and lastly, if the parties are close in terms, the parties know that all who are needed to commit to a deal are present and will sign off on binding agreement. Otherwise, a mediation without principals is fruitless and guarantees failure every time.

Strict Confidentiality is THE Key to Meaningful Mediation

Confidentiality at mediation is necessary, and it is not an evil necessity.  Confidentiality of the conversations and substance of mediation is equally critical to cases that settle and those that do not.  These days most parties to a successful mediation which ends in settlement do not want the results published or shared.  For those parties to a mediation that was not immediately successful in the first session, confidentiality is even more important.  It helps preserve negotiation position for later resolution sessions (a second mediation, arbitration, settlement conference, pre-trial conference).  If any substantial information is shared about mediation, then the parties' respective motivation and ability to continue settlement discussions are limited and sometimes destroyed.  The California Lawyer magazine recently published an article on the important of confidentiality at mediation. Now in the environment all parties to a dispute find themselves in (limited access to courts, escalating expenses), mediation is a critical part of every case.  It is no longer just an "option", it is a necessity.